|
|
William Walton (1902 - 1983)
Symphony No. 1
I. Allegro assai
II. Presto con malizia
III. Andante con malincolia
IV. Maestoso - Brioso ed ardamente - Vivacissimo
Few English compositions have
been as eagerly awaited as William Walton's first
symphony. After the wit of Façade (1923) and
Portsmouth Point (1926), the lyrical beauty
of the Viola Concerto (1929) and the splendour
of Belshazzar's Feast (1931), expectations
were high that the enfant terrible of 1930s English
music would produce something very special.
It was commissioned by Hamilton Harty for his Hallé
orchestra in January 1932. Initially work was very
slow, and it was obvious by December 1932 that the
premiere planned for April 1933 would have to be postponed.
However early 1933 saw good progress and by the summer
the first two movements were complete. The slow movement
followed and by October the beginning and end of the
last movement were also complete. Unfortunately Walton
now got stuck and could find no satisfactory completion
for the finale. Harty had by now moved to London and
the LSO, and had announced a revised premiere for
March 1934. Walton had to call this off, too, but
his continuing difficulty with the last movement resulted
in the LSO persuading him to allow a performance in
December 1934 of the first three movements only. This
performance, on 3rd December 1934, achieved a notable
success, and there were two further performances of
the unfinished symphony in April 1935 under Malcolm
Sargent. Walton then resumed work on the finale. He
later said that it had been his friend Constant Lambert's
idea to use a fugue in the central section. When Walton
objected that he did not know how to write one (he
never completed his music degree at Oxford!) Lambert
suggested "There is a rather good article on fugues
in Grove's Musical Dictionary". So Walton wrote the
fugue, with Grove at his elbow! He finished the movement
at the end of August 1935, and the long awaited premiere
of the complete symphony was given by the London Symphony
Orchestra under Hamilton Harty on 6th November, 1935.
Critics have never agreed about the symphony. Composer
John Ireland called it "the work of a true master,
in the real symphonic tradition. It is colossal, grand,
original and moving to the emotions to the most extreme
degree" while Benjamin Britten condemned it for its
"pretentiousness and its abominable scoring". It may
have stylistic affinities with Sibelius in its use
of long pedal notes and its sinuous melodies (particularly
the opening); it may have similarities to Prokofiev
in its emotional lyricism and pungent harmony (particularly
in the slow movement). What is undeniable is its relentless
drive and energy, which are quite unique.
It is interesting to note that the published score
is dedicated to Baroness Imma von Doernberg, with
whom Walton had lived and been much in love since
1931. Imma left him in 1933, before the completion
of the symphony, and even though he was soon in a
relationship with Alice Wimborne, he still kept the
dedication to Imma.
There are three main themes in the first movement:
the winding oboe tune at the opening, a long and slower
moving violin tune which seems to have no end, and
a more angular theme on violas and cellos. But the
movement is underpinned harmonically by the interval
of a minor 7th, built on top of a fifth and sixth,
as picked out by the horns at the very beginning.
This appears in many forms through the movement, which
is driven onward by a rhythmic energy quite shattering
in its impact.
The scherzo is marked "with malice" and everything
is indeed spiteful, bitter and twisted. As a scherzo
it is unusual, with no obvious formal structure, and
where no tune is played the same twice. The fast 3/4
tempo, frequent and almost random offbeat accents,
sudden silences, occasional bars of the wrong length,
sudden volume changes: all combine to give a relentless
and manic rush which leaves listener (and player!)
exhausted.
The slow movement is marked "melancholy", perhaps
in reaction to the bitter malice which preceded it.
The desolate flute melody at the start, as bleak as
Shostakovich, offers little comfort. The movement
swells gradually to a passionate and emotional climax
before fading to the faltering pulse with which it
began.
The finale is multi-sectioned: a ceremonial introduction
soon gives way to the fast main body of the movement.
This in turn leads to the fugue section, where an
angular and energetic theme is passed first from violas
to violins, then to cellos and basses, before being
developed into a big climax. The tempo then changes
to a faster triple time, and the music drives onward
to the coda. Walton has kept one trump up his sleeve,
and the percussion and second timpanist finally join
the fray for the closing peroration whose final bars
are punctuated by unexpected silences between the
hammer blow chords.
|